Will Ethereum Switch To Proof Of Stake

Proof-of-work (PoW)

Last edit:


Invalid DateTime

The Ethereum network began by using a consensus machinery that involved
Proof-of-work (Pow). This immune the nodes of the Ethereum network to concur on the state of all data recorded on the Ethereum blockchain and prevented sure kinds of economic attacks. However, Ethereum switched off proof-of-piece of work in 2022 and started using proof-of-stake instead.


Proof-of-work has now been deprecated. Ethereum no longer uses proof-of-work as office of its consensus mechanism. Instead, it uses proof-of-stake. Read more on proof-of-pale and staking.


To amend understand this page, we recommend y’all first read up on transactions, blocks, and consensus mechanisms.

What is Proof-of-work (PoW)?

Nakamoto consensus, which utilizes proof-of-work, is the mechanism that once allowed the decentralized Ethereum network to come to consensus (i.east. all nodes agree) on things like business relationship balances and the order of transactions. This prevented users from “double spending” their coins and ensured that the Ethereum concatenation was tremendously hard to assail or manipulate. These security properties now come from proof-of-stake instead using the consensus mechanism known every bit Gasper.

Proof-of-piece of work and mining

Proof-of-work is the underlying algorithm that sets the difficulty and rules for the piece of work miners exercise on proof-of-work blockchains. Mining is the “work” itself. It’due south the act of adding valid blocks to the chain. This is important considering the concatenation’s length helps the network follow the right fork of the blockchain. The more “work” washed, the longer the chain, and the higher the block number, the more certain the network tin be of the current state of things.

More on mining

How did Ethereum’due south proof-of-work work?

Ethereum transactions are processed into blocks. In the now-deprecated proof-of-piece of work Ethereum, each block contained:

  • block difficulty – for example: 3,324,092,183,262,715
  • mixHash – for example:
  • nonce – for example:

This block data was directly related to proof-of-piece of work.

The work in proof-of-work

The proof-of-work protocol, Ethash, required miners to go through an intense race of trial and error to find the nonce for a cake. Only blocks with a valid nonce could be added to the chain.

When racing to create a cake, a miner repeatedly put a dataset, that could but be obtained past downloading and running the full chain (as a miner does), through a mathematical function. The dataset was used to generate a mixHash below a target that is dictated by the block difficulty. The best mode to do this is through trial and fault.

The difficulty determined the target for the hash. The lower the target, the smaller the gear up of valid hashes. One time generated, this was incredibly easy for other miners and clients to verify. Even if one transaction were to change, the hash would be completely dissimilar, signalling fraud.

Hashing makes fraud easy to spot. Simply proof-of-work as a procedure was as well a big deterrent to attacking the concatenation.

Proof-of-work and security

Miners were incentivized to do this piece of work on the primary Ethereum concatenation. At that place was fiddling incentive for a subset of miners to showtime their own chain—it undermines the system. Blockchains rely on having a single state as a source of truth.

The objective of proof-of-work was to extend the concatenation. The longest chain was most believable as the valid ane because it had the well-nigh computational work done to generate it. Within Ethereum’s Prisoner of war system, it was nearly impossible to create new blocks that erase transactions, create fake ones, or maintain a second chain. That’s considering a malicious miner would have needed to always solve the cake nonce faster than everyone else.

To consistently create malicious yet valid blocks, a malicious miner would accept needed over 51% of the network mining power to beat anybody else. That amount of “work” requires a lot of expensive computing power and the free energy spent might even take outweighed the gains made in an set on.

Proof-of-work economics

Proof-of-piece of work was also responsible for issuing new currency into the system and incentivizing miners to practise the piece of work.

Since the Constantinople upgrade, miners who successfully create a block were rewarded with two freshly minted ETH and role of the transaction fees. Ommer blocks likewise compensated 1.75 ETH. Ommer blocks were valid blocks created past a miner practically at the same fourth dimension equally another miner created the canonical cake, which was ultimately determined by which chain was built on height of first. Ommer blocks usually happened due to network latency.


A transaction has “finality” on Ethereum when information technology’s part of a block that can’t alter.

Because miners worked in a decentralized way, 2 valid blocks could exist mined at the same time. This creates a temporary fork. Somewhen, one of these chains became the accepted chain after subsequent blocks were mined and added to it, making it longer.

To complicate things further, transactions rejected on the temporary fork may not take been included in the accepted concatenation. This means it could get reversed. And then finality refers to the time you lot should wait before considering a transaction irreversible. Under the previous proof-of-work Ethereum, the more blocks were mined on top of a specific block
N, the higher confidence that the transactions in
were successful and would not be reverted. Now, with proof-of-pale, finalization is an explicit, rather than probabilistic, property of a cake.

Proof-of-piece of work energy-usage

A major criticism of proof-of-work is the corporeality of free energy output required to proceed the network safe. To maintain security and decentralization, Ethereum on proof-of-work consumed large amounts of energy. Soon earlier switching to proof-of-stake, Ethereum miners were collectively consuming nigh 70 TWh/twelvemonth (about the same equally the Czech Republic – co-ordinate to digiconomist on 18-July-2022).

Pros and cons

Pros Cons
Proof-of-piece of work is neutral. You don’t need ETH to get started and cake rewards permit y’all to get from 0ETH to a positive balance. With proof-of-stake you need ETH to start with. Proof-of-work uses up and then much energy that it’s bad for the surroundings.
Proof-of-piece of work is a tried and tested consensus mechanism that has kept Bitcoin and Ethereum secure and decentralized for many years. If you want to mine, you lot need such specialized equipment that information technology’due south a big investment to start.
Compared to proof-of-pale it’s relatively easy to implement. Due to increasing computation needed, mining pools could potentially dominate the mining game, leading to centralization and security risks.

Compared to proof-of-stake

At a high level, proof-of-stake has the same end goal every bit proof-of-piece of work: to help the decentralized network reach consensus deeply. But it has some differences in process and personnel:

  • Proof-of-stake switches out the importance of computational power for staked ETH.
  • Proof-of-stake replaces miners with validators. Validators stake their ETH to activate the ability to create new blocks.
  • Validators don’t compete to create blocks, instead they are chosen at random by an algorithm.
  • Finality is clearer: at certain checkpoints, if two/3 validators agree on the country of the block information technology is considered last. Validators must bet their entire stake on this, so if they try to collude down the line, they’ll lose their unabridged pale.

More on proof-of-pale

More than of a visual learner?

Further Reading

  • Majority attack
  • On settlement finality


  • A technical caption of proof-of-work protocols
  • Mining
  • Proof-of-stake

Was this article helpful?

Source: https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pow/

Check Also

Will Dogecoin Go Up In Value

Will Dogecoin Go Up In Value

On Dec. 6, 2013, Billy Markus and Jackson Palmer decided to combine their dearest of …